A Systematic Review of the Use of Blogs and Vlogs as Self-Expressors for People with Serious and Common Mental Illness.

In 30 seconds

This systematic review examined empirical studies of blogs and vlogs used by people with serious or common mental illness. Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors searched four databases and included 18 peer-reviewed English-language studies published from 2014 to 2024. The narratives were generally first-person and addressed stigma, treatment barriers and symptom self-management. Reported benefits included support networks, less social isolation and empowerment, while identified risks included potential employment discrimination and emotional vulnerability to negative comments. The review relates these experiences to personal recovery and calls for further research, including on cross-cultural experiences.

Key findings

• Eighteen studies met the review’s inclusion criteria.
• Blogs and vlogs commonly featured first-person narratives about stigma, barriers to treatment and symptom self-management.
• Reported benefits included support networks, reduced social isolation and empowerment.
• Identified risks included possible employment discrimination and emotional vulnerability to negative comments.

Why it matters

Online illness narratives may offer people with mental illness avenues for expression, connection and empowerment, while also exposing them to potential harms. Recognising both sides can inform understanding of how digital media may relate to personal recovery and help guide research into ways to support beneficial use.

What to keep in mind

The review included only English-language studies published in peer-reviewed journals, and the abstract identifies a need for further research on cross-cultural experiences.