Global Incidence and Prevalence of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

CorneaAug 20, 2025 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOphthalmology

Aswen Sriranganathan, Clara C Chan, Jobanpreet Dhillon et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated keratoconus incidence and prevalence across age groups, sexes, and geographic regions, using studies identified through January 2024. Across 53 studies included in the meta-analysis, pooled prevalence was 289.1 per 100,000 persons (95% CI 124.2-671.1), equivalent to 0.24% of the population; pooled incidence was 4.0 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 2.5-6.3). Estimates varied by age and region, and prevalence and incidence were higher in more recent study periods. Males had slightly higher odds of keratoconus than females.

Key findings

  • Pooled prevalence was 289.1 per 100,000 persons (95% CI 124.2-671.1), or 0.24% of the population.
  • Pooled incidence was 4.0 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 2.5-6.3).
  • Males had higher odds of keratoconus than females (odds ratio 1.10; 95% CI 1.07-1.13).
  • The 20 to 29 age group had the highest reported prevalence (525.5 per 100,000 persons) and incidence (20.8 per 100,000 persons-years).

Why it matters

The pooled estimates provide a broad measure of keratoconus burden and show substantial variation by age, sex, region, and study period. Such variation is relevant to interpreting population-level estimates and identifying where surveillance and further research may be useful. The findings also underscore that global averages may not reflect local disease patterns.

What to keep in mind

The estimates were pooled across studies with substantial variation in reported prevalence by region and period; the abstract does not provide further detail on the sources of this heterogeneity.

Source

Published in Cornea. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Ophthalmology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.