The impact of early powered mobility training in families and children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type I.

Assist TechnolAug 22, 2025 (epub)

Cristina Isabel Díaz-López, Rocío Palomo-Carrión, María Coello-Villalón et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized, waitlist-controlled, single-blinded trial in Spain evaluated 12 weeks of powered mobility training with modified ride-on toy cars in 16 children aged 10 months to 5 years with spinal muscular atrophy type I, followed for a further 4 weeks. The experimental group showed clinically meaningful gains in Daily Activities and Mobility from week 4 (z = 0.41-0.72; g = 0.29-0.53). Social/Cognitive improvements exceeded the measurement-error threshold by weeks 8-16. Quality-of-life differences were significant at week 4 (p = 0.03; g = 0.93), but did not reach that threshold.

Key findings

  • Daily Activities and Mobility improved by week 4, with z = 0.41-0.72 and g = 0.29-0.53.
  • Social/Cognitive improvements exceeded SEMm by weeks 8-16.
  • Quality of life differed significantly at week 4 (p = 0.03; g = 0.93), but remained below the SEMm threshold.
  • Parental stress reductions were statistically significant at weeks 4, 8, and 16 (p < 0.05), but within SEMm margins.

Why it matters

Early powered mobility training may support functional independence in young children with SMA I, with gains in daily activities and mobility emerging during the intervention. The findings also suggest that functional improvements do not necessarily translate into comparable changes in quality of life or participation, underscoring the potential importance of psychosocial and environmental supports.

What to keep in mind

The trial included only 16 children and follow-up extended just 4 weeks beyond the 12-week intervention. Several reported changes, including quality of life and parental stress, did not exceed the stated SEMm threshold.

Source

Published in Assist Technol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pediatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.