Improving Procedure Completion and Engagement of Neurodivergent Patients in Medical Imaging: A Systematic Review.

J Med Radiat SciSep 19, 2025 (epub)
Clinical ResearchRadiology (Diagnostic)Nuclear MedicineOpen access

Rheann Wickramasinghe, Glenda McLean

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review examined strategies reported to support neurodivergent patients, including people with autism or ADHD, during medical imaging and improve examination completion. Of 1789 peer-reviewed articles identified, 11 met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis indicated that support is needed both before and during imaging. Reported approaches included mock imaging sessions, environmental adaptations, carer involvement, and flexibility in imaging techniques and scheduling. The authors noted that, although supportive strategies have been described, formal guidance for imaging professionals is lacking and further research and guideline development are needed.

Key findings

  • Of 1789 articles identified, 11 met the review’s eligibility criteria.
  • Thematic analysis identified a need for strategies both before and during imaging to support procedure completion.
  • Reported strategies included mock sessions, environmental adaptations, carer involvement, and flexibility in techniques and scheduling.
  • The review found no formal guidelines for neurodivergent-inclusive medical imaging care.

Why it matters

Sensory, communication, and emotional needs can create barriers to completing imaging examinations. The review brings together reported approaches that may help services address these barriers across the examination pathway. Its finding that formal guidance is absent also highlights a gap for research and guideline development aimed at more equitable access.

What to keep in mind

Only 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, and the review identifies reported strategies rather than establishing their comparative effectiveness.

Source

Published in J Med Radiat Sci. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Radiology (Diagnostic)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.