Safety and Utility of Superficial Circumflex Iliac Perforator versus Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Flaps in Pediatric Reconstructive Surgery.
Noelle Garbaccio, Dorien I Schonebaum, Jade E Smith et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This systematic review and meta-analysis compared superficial circumflex iliac perforator (SCIP) and superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIA) flaps in pediatric reconstructive surgery. Thirty-one studies contributed outcomes for 107 SCIA flaps and 57 SCIP flaps in patients aged 10 weeks to 17 years, most often treated for congenital or traumatic extremity defects. SCIP flaps were associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause complications, total flap loss, major and minor complications, and debulking than SCIA flaps (p < 0.05). All-cause complication rates were also significantly lower across age groups (p < 0.001).
Key findings
- Across 31 studies, outcomes were reported for 107 SCIA flaps and 57 SCIP flaps in patients aged 10 weeks to 17 years.
- Compared with SCIA flaps, SCIP flaps had significantly lower rates of all-cause complications, total flap loss, major and minor complications, and debulking (p < 0.05).
- All-cause complication rates differed significantly across age groups (p < 0.001).
Why it matters
Pediatric flap reconstruction must balance reliable tissue transfer with complications and later contouring procedures. These pooled findings suggest that SCIP flaps may offer a favorable safety profile and reduce the need for debulking compared with SCIA flaps, particularly in the congenital and traumatic extremity defects represented in the review. The results provide comparative evidence for considering flap options in pediatric reconstruction.
What to keep in mind
The review pooled evidence from 31 studies, and the abstract does not report randomized comparisons; the findings therefore depend on the underlying study designs and cohorts.