Grayson's Technique for Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding (PNAM) in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

Cleft Palate Craniofac JNov 20, 2025 (epub)
Clinical ResearchPlastic SurgeryPediatrics

Laith Bayan, Emma Nordahl, Kelson Huynh et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis assessed Grayson-protocol presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate. It included 21 studies reporting 534 infants, 368 of whom received PNAM. Pooled results showed improved nasal symmetry and a narrower alveolar gap: nostril width ratio decreased from 2.4 (95% CI, 1.7-3.1; I² = 98%) to 1.8 (95% CI, 0.9-2.6; I² = 97%), while the alveolar gap decreased from 10.7 mm (95% CI, 9.5-11.9; I² = 92%) to 3.9 mm (95% CI, 3.1-4.8; I² = 93%).

Key findings

  • Nostril width ratio decreased from 2.4 (95% CI, 1.7-3.1; I² = 98%) to 1.8 (95% CI, 0.9-2.6; I² = 97%).
  • Columellar angle increased from 52° (95% CI, 42.0-62.8; I² = 100%) to 70° (95% CI, 59.1-80.6; I² = 98%).
  • Alveolar gap narrowed from 10.7 mm (95% CI, 9.5-11.9; I² = 92%) to 3.9 mm (95% CI, 3.1-4.8; I² = 93%).
  • Intertuberosity distance increased slightly, from 31.3 mm (95% CI, 29.3-33.3; I² = 95%) to 31.8 mm (95% CI, 28.9-34.8; I² = 98%).

Why it matters

PNAM is intended to modify nasal and alveolar morphology before definitive surgery. The pooled findings suggest measurable changes in both areas, which may inform understanding of presurgical preparation in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate. However, substantial heterogeneity across outcomes and the need for standardized measures and long-term prospective studies temper confidence in the estimates.

What to keep in mind

The review reports very high heterogeneity across pooled outcomes. The authors call for standardized outcome measures and long-term prospective studies to confirm findings and refine protocols.

Source

Published in Cleft Palate Craniofac J. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Plastic Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.