Impact of Chewing Behavior Change on Cognition and Cerebral Hemodynamics.

JDR Clin Trans ResNov 26, 2025 (epub)
Clinical ResearchGeriatricsNeurology

M T Sta Maria, Y Hasegawa, S Yoshimura et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized controlled trial tested whether encouraging thorough chewing during meals affects cognition and cerebral hemodynamics in adults aged 65 years or older. Fifty participants were assigned to a 1-month wearable-device intervention to increase chewing strokes or to usual chewing. Significant time-by-group interactions were reported for memory (F (1, 48) = 6.24, P = 0.043) and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex hemodynamic responses (F (1, 48) = 6.19, P = 0.013). The intervention group increased chewing frequency and improved memory, alongside reduced left-sided cortical responses; other outcomes did not differ significantly.

Key findings

  • Memory showed a significant time-by-group interaction: F (1, 48) = 6.24, P = 0.043.
  • Left DLPFC hemodynamic responses showed a significant time-by-group interaction: F (1, 48) = 6.19, P = 0.013.
  • Chewing frequency increased in the intervention group (P = 0.017) and correlated positively with Stroop test scores (r = 0.53, P = 0.010).
  • Other cognitive outcomes and hemodynamic measures favored intervention but did not reach statistical significance.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that a behavioral change during meals may influence memory performance and task-related prefrontal hemodynamics in older adults. The observed reduction in left DLPFC responses alongside improved memory is consistent with the authors’ interpretation of greater neural efficiency, but does not establish a mechanism or demonstrate prevention of cognitive decline or dementia.

What to keep in mind

The intervention lasted only 1 month and included 50 participants; longer studies are needed to assess whether effects persist.

Source

Published in JDR Clin Trans Res. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Geriatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.