Sacral Nerve Stimulation and Chronic Bladder Pain: Meta-Analysis.

NeuromodulationDec 6, 2025 (epub)
Clinical ResearchUrology

Rodwan Husein, Moein Tavakkoli, Sara Ahmadi Abhari et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis assessed sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for pain, urinary symptoms, and quality of life in adults with chronic bladder pain syndrome. Across 15 studies involving 494 patients, SNS was associated with a reduction in pain scores of -2.27 on a 0-10 scale (95% CI: -2.94 to -1.60, p < 0.001). Urinary frequency and nocturia also decreased, while changes in interstitial cystitis problem scores and quality of life were not statistically significant. The authors caution that methodological limitations constrain confidence in these findings.

Key findings

  • Pain scores decreased by -2.27 on a 0-10 scale (95% CI: -2.94 to -1.60, p < 0.001).
  • ICSI decreased by -2.18 (95% CI: -2.99 to -1.37, p < 0.001).
  • Urinary frequency decreased by -1.71 voids/d (95% CI: -2.29 to -1.12), and nocturia by -1.49 episodes/night (95% CI: -2.35 to -0.63).
  • ICPI and quality-of-life changes were not statistically significant; complication rates ranged from 0% to 40.6% and explantation rates from 0% to 18%.

Why it matters

The pooled findings suggest SNS may improve pain and some urinary symptoms in adults with chronic bladder pain syndrome, outcomes that can substantially affect daily functioning. However, the evidence does not establish treatment efficacy with the certainty of randomized comparisons, and reported complication and explantation rates varied. These results help frame potential benefit alongside uncertainty and procedural risks.

What to keep in mind

The authors report substantial methodological heterogeneity, moderate-to-high risk of bias, and no randomized controlled trials; these limitations restrict the strength of conclusions.

Source

Published in Neuromodulation. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Urology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.