Central Venous Access Device Complications in Children With Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Eur J HaematolDec 15, 2025 (epub)
Clinical ResearchPediatricsHematologyOncology (Medical)Open access

Mahesh Sakthivel, Pranathi Katneni, Ramesh M Nataraja et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis assessed central venous access device (CVAD) complications in children aged 18 years or younger receiving treatment for leukemia. Across 24 studies covering 13,879 CVADs, the pooled proportion of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) was 31.3% (95% CI 23.6-39.6), while device failure was 18.5% (95% CI 10.8-27.8). These were the most frequent reported complications. Tunneled devices were associated with a higher proportion of complications than totally implantable devices, although the authors call for further prospective research.

Key findings

  • CLABSI had a pooled proportion of 31.3% (95% CI 23.6-39.6).
  • Device failure had a pooled proportion of 18.5% (95% CI 10.8-27.8).
  • CVAD-associated venous thromboembolism had a pooled proportion of 5.2% (95% CI 2.9-8.3).
  • Tunneled devices were associated with a higher proportion of complications than totally implantable devices.

Why it matters

Children receiving leukemia treatment often need prolonged central venous access, and this synthesis quantifies the range of associated complications across a substantial body of studies. The high pooled proportions of CLABSI and device failure underscore the clinical burden of access-related problems in this population and provide context for evaluating device-related risks.

What to keep in mind

The review included studies spanning 1970-2025, and the authors state that further large prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to investigate the findings and their impact on morbidity and mortality.

Source

Published in Eur J Haematol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pediatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.