Navicular fractures in elite athletes-2025 International Foot and Ankle Sports Consensus and systematic review.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol ArthroscDec 26, 2025 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOrthopedic SurgeryOpen access

Kassidy J Webber, Vanessa J Boggiano, Julia M Balboni et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This Level V systematic review and modified Delphi consensus examined diagnosis, treatment and return-to-sport guidance for elite athletes with navicular fractures. The review identified 319 athletes; among those treated surgically, mean return to sport was 8.2 weeks postoperatively, and 98.7% resumed competition. The panel strongly supported 4–6 weeks of nonweightbearing after surgery and anticipated return to full sport within 4–6 months. Thirty-four consensus statements were developed, including 10 with unanimous agreement; two statements did not reach consensus.

Key findings

  • Among 319 athletes in the systematic review, surgically treated athletes returned to sport at a mean of 8.2 weeks postoperatively.
  • Competition resumed in 98.7% of surgically treated athletes.
  • The panel strongly supported 4–6 weeks of nonweightbearing after surgery and return to full sport within 4–6 months.
  • Of 34 consensus statements, 10 achieved unanimous consensus, 21 strong consensus and 2 did not reach consensus.

Why it matters

Navicular fractures can entail prolonged recovery, while treatment and rehabilitation approaches have lacked standardisation. This review combines published athlete outcomes with expert consensus to outline postoperative progression and return-to-sport expectations. The findings offer a structured reference for discussing recovery timelines, while the evidence level and consensus-based design warrant appropriate caution.

What to keep in mind

The evidence is Level V and combines a consensus process with a systematic review; the abstract does not report comparative treatment outcomes.

Source

Published in Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Orthopedic Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.