Reinforcement learning for medical image analysis: a systematic review of algorithms, engineering challenges, and clinical deployment.

Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon)Dec 26, 2025 (epub)
Clinical ResearchRadiology (Diagnostic)

Masuda Begum Sampa, Nor Hidayati Abdul Aziz, Md Siddikur Rahman et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review examined 20 peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and 2023 on reinforcement learning (RL) for medical image analysis. The studies covered landmark detection, segmentation, lesion identification, diagnosis, registration, and related tasks, using classical and deep RL methods. Reported applications included DQN for landmark detection and cardiovascular risk estimation, and PPO and A2C for vessel tracking. The authors propose a four-component framework for RL in medical imaging and identify persistent challenges in policy optimization, anatomical context, data availability, and interpretability. The review describes promising applications but does not report a pooled quantitative estimate of performance.

Key findings

  • The review synthesized 20 studies published between 2019 and 2023 across multiple medical imaging tasks.
  • DQN was reported to perform strongly in anatomical landmark detection and cardiovascular risk estimation.
  • PPO and A2C achieved optimal policy learning for vessel tracking in the reviewed studies.
  • The proposed RLMI framework comprises state representation, policy optimization, reward formulation, and environment modeling.

Why it matters

RL offers a way to model sequential decisions in image-analysis tasks, including navigation, detection, and registration. The review organizes diverse approaches into a common framework and highlights barriers relevant to translation, particularly data scarcity and limited interpretability. These findings may help guide evaluation and development, while the breadth of applications should not be mistaken for established clinical effectiveness.

What to keep in mind

The review includes only 20 studies published between 2019 and 2023, and the abstract provides no pooled quantitative performance estimate or evidence of clinical deployment outcomes.

Source

Published in Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon). This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Radiology (Diagnostic)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.