Respiratory-swallow coordination training using bimodal signal biofeedback for patients with post-stroke dysphagia: a randomized controlled trial.

Ann MedDec 29, 2025 (epub)
Clinical ResearchPhysical Medicine & RehabilitationOpen access

Lian Wang, Jia Qiao, Zhenhai Wei et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether adding bimodal signal biofeedback-based respiratory-swallow coordination training to conventional rehabilitation improved swallowing in patients with post-stroke dysphagia. Thirty patients were assigned to conventional rehabilitation alone or rehabilitation plus training delivered for 30 minutes daily, six days per week, for two weeks. Both groups improved on the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), but improvement was greater with added training at treatment completion and one-month follow-up (p < 0.001). The experimental group also had a lower proportion with PAS scores ≥6 after treatment and more optimal respiratory-swallow patterns.

Key findings

  • FOIS improvement was greater with added training than with conventional rehabilitation at post-treatment and one-month follow-up (p < 0.001).
  • A ≥2-point FOIS increase occurred in a significantly higher proportion of the experimental group at post-treatment and follow-up (both p < 0.01).
  • After two weeks, the experimental group had a lower percentage of PAS scores ≥6 than controls (p < 0.001).
  • Optimal respiratory-swallow patterns were more frequent with added training than with conventional rehabilitation (p < 0.001).

Why it matters

Post-stroke dysphagia can affect oral intake and airway protection. This trial suggests that targeting coordination between breathing and swallowing with biofeedback may improve functional intake and swallowing-related measures beyond conventional rehabilitation alone, with differences also reported at one-month follow-up. The findings support further consideration of respiratory-swallow coordination as a rehabilitation target, while the small trial warrants cautious interpretation.

What to keep in mind

Only 30 patients were enrolled, and follow-up was limited to one month.

Source

Published in Ann Med. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.