Comparison of the predictive performance of systemic immune-inflammation index and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for three-month poor functional outcome in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ann MedJan 12, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchNeurologyInternal Medicine (General)Open access

Xuan Ma, Yinjuan Zhou, Zhenhua Li et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the prognostic performance of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for poor functional outcome at three months after ischemic stroke. It included 21 observational studies involving 7520 patients. NLR had a numerically higher area under the curve than SII (0.71, 95% CI: 0.67-0.76 vs. 0.68, 95% CI: 0.64-0.71), but the difference was not statistically significant. Elevated NLR was associated with poor outcome; SII was not significantly associated, although both markers showed moderate effect sizes.

Key findings

  • NLR’s AUC was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67-0.76), compared with 0.68 (95% CI: 0.64-0.71) for SII; the difference was not statistically significant.
  • Elevated NLR was associated with poor outcome (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.17-1.37, p < .001); SII was not (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00-1.00, p = .384).
  • Both markers showed moderate effect sizes (SMD: NLR = 0.69, SII = 0.72; p < .001).
  • NLR performed better in non-intervention and Chinese subgroups, while SII showed consistent AUC values across treatment and ethnic subgroups.

Why it matters

Three-month functional prognosis can inform risk stratification after ischemic stroke. This synthesis suggests that NLR may offer useful prognostic information and had a numerically higher discriminative performance than SII, while the lack of a statistically significant AUC difference cautions against treating the markers as definitively different. SII’s reported subgroup consistency may also be relevant when considering performance across patient groups.

What to keep in mind

The analysis included observational studies, so the reported associations do not establish causation. The abstract does not report whether study populations or measurement methods varied substantially.

Source

Published in Ann Med. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Neurology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.