Quadrangular Taper Cementless Designs Are Associated With Lower Risks of Postoperative Periprosthetic Fracture Compared With Cemented Stems and Other Cementless Designs Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J ArthroplastyJan 12, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOrthopedic Surgery

Roham Borazjani, Seyyed Hamidreza Ayatizadeh, Mahta Sattarian et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) and other outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty using cemented or cementless stems, with analyses by cementless stem design. Across 18 studies and 55,942 procedures, overall PFF rates were 1.3% with cementless and 0.9% with cemented stems; the difference was not statistically significant (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 0.95 to 2.02; P = 0.089). By design, quadrangular stems were associated with lower PFF risk, while anatomic fit-and-fill stems were associated with higher PFF and all-cause revision risks.

Key findings

  • Quadrangular stems (type B2) were associated with lower PFF risk (OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.96, P = 0.033).
  • Anatomic fit-and-fill stems (type C2) were associated with higher PFF risk (OR = 2.86; 95% CI = 2.10 to 3.90, P < 0.001).
  • Anatomic fit-and-fill stems were associated with higher all-cause revision risk (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.22, P = 0.001).
  • Cementless stems were associated with lower aseptic loosening than cemented stems (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.56; P < 0.001).

Why it matters

The findings suggest that postoperative fracture risk may differ meaningfully among cementless stem geometries, even though the pooled comparison of cementless and cemented stems did not show a statistically significant difference in PFF. Considering design-specific outcomes may therefore help frame implant selection and risk discussions, while the evidence remains based on pooled comparative studies rather than a single randomized comparison.

What to keep in mind

The meta-analysis pooled comparative studies, and the abstract does not report that the evidence came from randomized trials. Overall PFF estimates showed moderate heterogeneity (I 2 = 45.4%).

Source

Published in J Arthroplasty. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Orthopedic Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.