Dexmedetomidine reduces acute kidney injury in high-risk but not low-risk patients after non-cardiac surgery: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

J AnesthJan 17, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchAnesthesiologyNephrologyGeneral SurgeryOpen access

Xin-Quan Liang, Mei-Lin Li, Chun-Jing Li

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This secondary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed intraoperative dexmedetomidine and acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients aged 60 years or older undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery. Risk was classified using the General Surgery Acute Kidney Injury Risk Index, and AKI was assessed within 7 postoperative days. Among high-risk patients, AKI occurred in 12.6% (13/103) with dexmedetomidine versus 23.4% (25/107) with placebo (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.00, P = 0.043). Low-risk patients had no significant difference between groups.

Key findings

  • In high-risk patients, dexmedetomidine was associated with lower AKI incidence: 12.6% (13/103) versus 23.4% (25/107); RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.00, P = 0.043.
  • After multivariable adjustment, dexmedetomidine remained associated with lower AKI risk in high-risk patients (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.98, P = 0.045).
  • Among low-risk patients, AKI incidence did not differ significantly: 7.9% versus 9.6%; RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.55, P = 0.543.
  • Urological surgery was an independent predictor of AKI across the cohort.

Why it matters

Postoperative AKI is associated with poor long-term outcomes, and these findings suggest that any kidney-protective association of intraoperative dexmedetomidine may differ by baseline AKI risk. The risk-stratified results are relevant when interpreting perioperative evidence, while the absence of a significant difference in low-risk patients cautions against assuming a uniform effect across surgical patients.

What to keep in mind

This was a secondary analysis of a randomized trial, and the reported benefit was confined to the high-risk subgroup; the abstract does not report whether the subgroup comparison was prespecified.

Source

Published in J Anesth. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Anesthesiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.