Free-breathing non-contrast-enhanced flow-independent MR angiography using REACT: A prospective study for pediatric vessel assessment.

RofoJan 30, 2026 (epub)

Jakob Spogis, Ilias Tsiflikas, Christoph Katemann et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This prospective, single-centre study compared free-breathing, non-contrast REACT MR angiography with contrast-enhanced multiphasic MRA for extrathoracic vessel assessment in 30 children (mean age 12.3 ± 4 years). Both techniques received median image-quality ratings of 4–5, with no significant difference between ratings (p = 0.12–0.58). Vessel diameter measurements correlated strongly (r = 0.93). REACT acquisition took 2:49 ± 1:03 min, compared with 3:49 ± 1:03 min for CE-MRA; abdominal REACT VANE took 4:51 ± 0:52 min.

Key findings

  • Median image-quality ratings were 4–5 for both methods, with no significant difference (p = 0.12–0.58).
  • Vessel diameter measurements showed strong correlation between REACT and CE-MRA (r = 0.93); intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.97 for each method.
  • REACT acquisition took 2:49 ± 1:03 min; abdominal REACT VANE took 4:51 ± 0:52 min, versus 3:49 ± 1:03 min for CE-MRA.
  • REACT showed higher venous SNR and higher arterial and venous CNR (p = 0.001-0.018).

Why it matters

Children may undergo vascular MRI for assessment of extrathoracic vessels, while contrast-enhanced MRA requires gadolinium-based contrast. In this study, free-breathing REACT produced image quality comparable to CE-MRA and closely correlated vessel diameter measurements, supporting its evaluation as a contrast-free imaging option. The findings are relevant to imaging protocols seeking to assess vessels without contrast injection.

What to keep in mind

The study was single-centre and included 30 patients; REACT was assessed against CE-MRA in children already referred for contrast-enhanced MRI.

Source

Published in Rofo. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pediatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.