Biodegradable Stents in Benign Biliary and Pancreatic Disease: A Systematic Review.

Surg InnovFeb 8, 2026 (epub)

Dimitra V Peristeri, Harriet Fransis, Ravi Vissapragada et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review assessed human studies of biodegradable stents for benign biliary and pancreatic diseases, including strictures and bile leaks. Fifteen studies involving 467 patients were included; stents were placed endoscopically or percutaneously. Technical success was 99.4%, while clinical success was 73.3%. Complications included cholangitis, recurrent stricture, bleeding, and pain or fever. The mean reintervention rate was 35.5%, often reflecting planned care after stent degradation rather than device failure. The authors concluded that biodegradable stents appear safe and effective in selected conditions, while noting the need for prospective and randomized studies.

Key findings

  • Across 15 studies and 467 patients, technical success was 99.4% and clinical success was 73.3%.
  • The mean reintervention rate was 35.5% (range 0-100%), largely reflecting planned management after stent degradation.
  • A total of 108 complications were reported; cholangitis was most frequent (n = 36), followed by stricture recurrence (n = 19).

Why it matters

Biodegradable stents offer temporary ductal support without planned retrieval, potentially addressing some burdens of conventional stenting. The review suggests high technical placement success, but the lower clinical success and substantial reintervention rate underscore that technical feasibility does not guarantee durable benefit. These findings help frame the evidence while highlighting the need to clarify which benign conditions and patients are most likely to benefit.

What to keep in mind

The evidence comprised 15 studies, and the authors call for prospective studies and randomized trials to establish optimal indications and long-term outcomes.

Source

Published in Surg Innov. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Gastroenterology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.