The Most Efficient Surgical Technique to Treat Velopharyngeal Insufficiency After Primary Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cleft Palate Craniofac JFeb 9, 2026 (epub)

Amirhossein Fasahat, Mohammad Omid, Fatemeh Khanlar et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared five surgical techniques for velopharyngeal insufficiency after primary cleft palate repair, using improvement in hypernasality as the outcome. It included 1774 patients from 31 studies; syndromic patients and studies without original data were excluded. Furlow palatoplasty had the highest average improvement rate at 85.06%, closely followed by pharyngeal flap at 84.50%. Heterogeneity was high across most technique groups, and complication profiles varied, with some studies reporting more obstructive sleep apnea after pharyngeal flap.

Key findings

  • Average hypernasality improvement was 85.06% with Furlow palatoplasty and 84.50% with pharyngeal flap.
  • Improvement rates were 83.04% for sphincter pharyngoplasty, 77.61% for buccinator flap, and 59.69% for buccal flap.
  • Heterogeneity was high across most surgical groups, with I² up to 100%.
  • Complication rates varied; some studies associated pharyngeal flap with higher obstructive sleep apnea rates.

Why it matters

The pooled results suggest that several procedures can improve hypernasality, but the small differences between leading techniques should be interpreted in light of substantial variability among studies and patients. The reported variation in complications, including obstructive sleep apnea in some pharyngeal-flap studies, reinforces the importance of weighing speech outcomes alongside potential harms when considering secondary surgery.

What to keep in mind

High heterogeneity across most groups limits confidence in comparisons between techniques; study designs and patient characteristics varied.

Source

Published in Cleft Palate Craniofac J. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Plastic Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.