Mechanical thrombectomy for elderly stroke patients: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Neuroradiol JFeb 18, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchNeurologyGeriatricsOpen access

Leonardo Januário Campos Cardoso, Ahmet Günkan, Marcio Yuri Ferreira et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled randomized clinical trials comparing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with standard medical management for acute ischemic stroke in patients over 70 years. Across 15 trials involving 1481 elderly patients, MT was associated with better functional recovery (OR 1.54; 95% CI: 1.22-1.94; P < .01), higher rates of excellent and good outcomes, and lower rates of poor outcomes and mortality at 90 days. The authors conclude that MT may benefit selected elderly patients, while noting limited elderly-specific safety data and selective trial populations.

Key findings

  • MT was associated with better functional recovery: OR 1.54; 95% CI: 1.22-1.94; P < .01.
  • Excellent outcomes were more frequent with MT (RR 1.60; 95% CI: 1.11-2.30; P = .01), as were good outcomes (RR 1.84; 95% CI: 1.45-2.35; P < .01).
  • MT was associated with fewer poor functional outcomes (RR 0.71; 95% CI: 0.58-0.85; P < .01) and lower mortality (RR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.45-0.96; P = .03).
  • Subgroup results were consistent across age threshold, circulation territory, and country socioeconomic status analyses.

Why it matters

Older adults with acute ischemic stroke may have substantial functional and survival benefit associated with thrombectomy, addressing uncertainty about outcomes in this population. The findings support considering evidence from elderly patients rather than assuming results in the general trial population apply uniformly, while the review’s cautions underscore the need to interpret pooled estimates in light of limited safety data and selective enrollment.

What to keep in mind

The authors note limited elderly-specific safety data and selective trial populations, which may constrain how well the findings apply to older patients outside those trials.

Source

Published in Neuroradiol J. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Neurology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.