Cranial magnetic resonance imaging findings in methanol poisoning: Systematic review and meta-analysis of radiological prevalence.

Neuroradiol JFeb 19, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchRadiology (Diagnostic)NeurologyOpen access

Rebeca Oliveira da Silva, Victor Arthur Ohannesian, Bianca Nobre Aguirre et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed cranial MRI findings and in-hospital mortality among patients with confirmed methanol poisoning. Thirteen studies were included; pooled estimates drew on eight studies for putaminal necrosis, four for optic nerve injury, and seven for mortality. Putaminal necrosis was the most frequent MRI finding, with a pooled prevalence of 47.6% (95% CI 30.3-65.6; I 2 = 75.0%). Optic nerve injury prevalence was 36.1% (95% CI 9.2-75.8; I 2 = 84.0%), and pooled in-hospital mortality was 7.8% (95% CI 2.2-24.1; I 2 = 53.9%).

Key findings

  • Putaminal necrosis had a pooled prevalence of 47.6% (95% CI 30.3-65.6; I 2 = 75.0%).
  • Optic nerve injury had a pooled prevalence of 36.1% (95% CI 9.2-75.8; I 2 = 84.0%).
  • Pooled in-hospital mortality was 7.8% (95% CI 2.2-24.1; I 2 = 53.9%).

Why it matters

The pooled estimates characterize the frequency of important MRI abnormalities in methanol poisoning, with putaminal necrosis the most commonly reported finding. This can help clinicians recognize the range of neurological injury described in affected patients. The substantial heterogeneity, particularly for optic nerve injury, means these prevalence estimates should be interpreted cautiously rather than assumed to apply uniformly across settings.

What to keep in mind

The estimates were based on a limited number of studies, and heterogeneity was substantial for MRI findings, including optic nerve injury (I 2 = 84.0%).

Source

Published in Neuroradiol J. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Radiology (Diagnostic)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.