Surgical treatment of Peyronie's disease by plaque incision and buccal mucosa graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Asian J AndrolFeb 24, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchUrology

Hattan Badr, Carlo Bettocchi, Abdulrahman Alsalem et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed plaque incision with buccal mucosa grafting for Peyronie’s disease, using 17 reports (nine full-text studies and eight abstracts). Pooled results indicated a 98.6% success rate and 92.1% satisfaction rate. De novo erectile dysfunction and penile shortening were reported at 1.7% and 1.1%, respectively. Erectile-function scores and length of the affected penile side also increased. In head-to-head analyses, outcomes were comparable with other grafting methods; the authors note that randomized trials are needed for further evaluation.

Key findings

  • Pooled success and satisfaction rates with plaque incision and buccal mucosa grafting were 98.6% and 92.1%, respectively.
  • De novo erectile dysfunction was reported in 1.7%, and penile shortening in 1.1%.
  • The International Index of Erectile Function increased by 1.69 points, and affected-side length increased by 1.99 cm.
  • Head-to-head analyses found outcomes comparable between buccal mucosa and other grafting methods.

Why it matters

The pooled findings suggest that plaque incision with buccal mucosa grafting can achieve high reported success and satisfaction, with low reported rates of erectile dysfunction and shortening. Comparisons with other grafts did not show a clear advantage for this technique, so the results help frame it as a potential surgical option rather than establishing its superiority.

What to keep in mind

The review included reports and abstracts, and the authors state that further randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate efficacy against other grafting techniques.

Source

Published in Asian J Androl. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Urology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.