Preoperative Triple Pelvic Examination and Transvaginal Sonography: Diagnostic Predictive Value for Posterior Pelvic Deep Endometriosis.

J Minim Invasive GynecolMar 14, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchObstetrics & Gynecology

Lihua Cheng, Chongchong Wang, Yufang Xia et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This prospective randomized controlled clinical study assessed whether triple pelvic examination, alone or combined with transvaginal sonography (TVS), predicts posterior pelvic deep endometriosis in 85 patients undergoing endometriosis surgery. Preoperative Enzian scores were compared with intraoperative scores. Clinical examination was more sensitive than TVS for uterosacral ligament (USL) lesions, whereas TVS was better for lesions in the pouch of Douglas. Combining the assessments improved sensitivity and accuracy, particularly for USL involvement: TVS sensitivity was 68.18% when sonographers received examination findings beforehand, compared with 38.10% for TVS performed independently (p = .023).

Key findings

  • Triple pelvic examination had higher sensitivity than TVS for USL lesions in both groups (p = .002 and p = .049).
  • TVS was superior to triple pelvic examination for detecting pouch-of-Douglas deep endometriosis (p = .001 and p = .049).
  • For USL lesions, TVS sensitivity was 68.18% with prior examination findings versus 38.10% with TVS alone (p = .023).
  • Combining examination and TVS improved sensitivity and accuracy for deep pelvic lesions, particularly USL involvement.

Why it matters

Posterior pelvic deep endometriosis can involve sites that are assessed differently by clinical examination and imaging. These findings suggest that the methods may provide complementary preoperative information, with examination findings potentially improving sonographic detection of USL disease. More accurate preoperative mapping may help characterize disease before surgery, although the study does not establish effects on surgical or patient outcomes.

What to keep in mind

The study included 85 patients at a single hospital; the abstract reports diagnostic performance but not effects on surgical or patient outcomes.

Source

Published in J Minim Invasive Gynecol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.