Tugging the Foley catheter balloon every 3 h in nulliparous induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial.

Int J Gynaecol ObstetMar 23, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchObstetrics & GynecologyOpen access

Muhamad Aznor Aqwa Azman, Mukhri Hamdan, Thai Ying Wong et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized controlled trial at a university hospital in Malaysia compared forceful 30-second Foley balloon tugging every 3 hours with usual care during planned 12-hour balloon placement for labor induction in nulliparous patients. Among 264 participants, median induction-to-birth duration was 33.2 [25.3-43.4] hours with tugging versus 37.2 [27.9-45.8] hours with usual care (P = 0.058). Satisfaction scores were 9 [7-10] in both groups (P = 0.437). The authors concluded that scheduled tugging did not expedite birth or improve satisfaction.

Key findings

  • Median induction-to-birth duration was 33.2 [25.3-43.4] hours with tugging versus 37.2 [27.9-45.8] hours with usual care (P = 0.058).
  • Labor-induction satisfaction scores were 9 [7-10] in both groups (P = 0.437).
  • Umbilical artery pH ≤7.10 occurred in 2/126 (1.6%) versus 3/129 (2.3%); relative risk 0.67 95% CI 0.11-3.95 P > 0.99.

Why it matters

Foley balloon induction is used to prepare the cervix, and this trial tested whether a simple scheduled maneuver could shorten the time to birth or improve the patient experience. Neither primary outcome differed significantly between groups. The findings help clarify that, in the studied nulliparous population and 12-hour placement protocol, routine tugging did not demonstrate these intended benefits.

What to keep in mind

The trial was conducted at one university hospital in Malaysia and studied nulliparous patients with a planned 12-hour Foley placement; applicability beyond this setting and protocol is uncertain.

Source

Published in Int J Gynaecol Obstet. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.