Effect of probiotic and synbiotic administration on the nutritional status of hemodialysis patients: a randomized-controlled trial.

Int Urol NephrolMar 23, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchNephrologyGastroenterologyOpen access

Walaa M Saad, Yara Moheb, Ehab Wafa et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This single-blind randomized controlled trial assessed probiotic and synbiotic supplementation in 60 maintenance hemodialysis patients over 24 weeks. Participants received Lactobacillus plantarum, the same probiotic with oat fiber β-glucans, or standard care. Triceps skinfold thickness increased by 3.3 ± 2.2 mm with probiotic and 4.7 ± 2.2 mm with synbiotic, compared with 0.0 ± 1.6 mm with standard care (p < 0.001). BMI also increased more in both supplementation groups. Albumin rose within the probiotic group, but between-group differences were not significant; other reported biochemical outcomes did not change significantly.

Key findings

  • Triceps skinfold thickness increased by 3.3 ± 2.2 mm with probiotic and 4.7 ± 2.2 mm with synbiotic, versus 0.0 ± 1.6 mm with standard care (p < 0.001).
  • BMI increased by 1.4 ± 1.0 kg/m² with probiotic and 1.7 ± 0.4 kg/m² with synbiotic, versus 0.7 ± 0.9 kg/m² with standard care (p < 0.001).
  • Albumin increased within the probiotic group by 0.25 ± 0.37 g/dL (p = 0.008), but between-group differences were not significant.
  • No significant changes occurred in nPCR, total protein, cholesterol, or leptin; no serious adverse events were reported.

Why it matters

Nutritional impairment is common in hemodialysis, and this trial found improvements in two anthropometric markers with probiotic or synbiotic supplementation. The absence of significant between-group differences in albumin and changes in other biochemical measures means the findings support a limited nutritional signal rather than evidence of broad improvement across nutritional outcomes.

What to keep in mind

The trial was single-blind and included 60 patients followed for 24 weeks; reported benefits were mainly in anthropometric markers, with no significant between-group albumin difference.

Source

Published in Int Urol Nephrol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Nephrology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.