Patient-Reported Outcomes of Palatopharyngeal Surgery Without Tonsillectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

LaryngoscopeMar 29, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOtolaryngology (ENT)Open access

Samuel Tschopp, Flora Meinert, Georgios Mantokoudis et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared patient-reported outcomes after palatopharyngeal surgery without tonsillectomy in adults treated for snoring or obstructive sleep apnea. Across 55 studies involving 1815 patients, surgery was associated with a mean 3.3-point reduction in Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores (95% CI, 2.7 to 3.9) and a 4.1-point reduction in snoring intensity (95% CI, 3.7 to 4.6). Outcomes varied by technique; several approaches showed the largest reductions. The authors found no evidence that effectiveness declined with longer follow-up, although study heterogeneity was considerable and overall risk of bias was moderate.

Key findings

  • Across 55 studies and 1815 patients, mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores fell by 3.3 points (95% CI, 2.7 to 3.9).
  • Snoring intensity decreased by a mean of 4.1 points (95% CI, 3.7 to 4.6).
  • Suture palatopharyngoplasty, muscle relocation, cold-steel techniques, and powered instruments showed the largest reductions in both outcomes.
  • Meta-regression found no evidence of declining effectiveness with longer follow-up for either patient-reported outcome.

Why it matters

Patient-reported sleepiness and snoring are relevant outcomes when assessing surgery for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. These pooled estimates suggest improvement after palatopharyngeal procedures performed without tonsillectomy, while variation by technique and considerable heterogeneity indicate that results should be interpreted in the context of the underlying studies.

What to keep in mind

Heterogeneity across studies was considerable, and the overall risk of bias was moderate.

Source

Published in Laryngoscope. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Otolaryngology (ENT)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.