Effect of cricoid pressure on tracheal intubation time during C-MAC video laryngoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Anaesth Crit Care Pain MedMar 30, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchAnesthesiology

Smitha Cb, Kunal Singh, Amarjeet Kumar et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This double-blind randomised controlled trial assessed whether cricoid pressure affects tracheal intubation with C-MAC video laryngoscopy in 100 adults undergoing elective surgery. Compared with sham pressure, cricoid pressure was associated with a longer mean intubation time: 35.6 ± 8.03 s versus 31.2 ± 9.36 s, a mean difference of 4.42 seconds (P = 0.013). The groups did not differ significantly in intubation attempts, glottic view scores, reported laryngoscopy or tube-advancement difficulty, or postoperative hoarseness.

Key findings

  • Mean intubation time was 35.6 ± 8.03 s with cricoid pressure and 31.2 ± 9.36 s with sham pressure; mean difference 4.42 seconds (P = 0.013).
  • The number of intubation attempts did not differ significantly between groups.
  • Glottic opening scores, difficulty ratings, and postoperative hoarseness were similar between groups.

Why it matters

The trial provides randomised evidence that cricoid pressure can modestly prolong intubation during C-MAC video laryngoscopy in adults having elective surgery, without a detected difference in attempts or the other reported outcomes. Intubation time is relevant to airway management, but these findings address this specific setting and do not establish effects in other populations or clinical circumstances.

What to keep in mind

The study involved 100 adults undergoing elective surgery and evaluated C-MAC video laryngoscopy; applicability to other airway settings or devices is not established by the abstract.

Source

Published in Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Anesthesiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.