Incidence and Risks of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

LaryngoscopeApr 4, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOtolaryngology (ENT)Open access

John Dewey, Heli Majeethia, Kushal Modi et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) after treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) in adults. Seventeen studies, including 3685 patients, were pooled, although diagnostic methods varied substantially. The overall pooled CRS incidence was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.27-0.47). Incidence was higher in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) than in other HNC (0.45 vs. 0.18, p < 0.001). Radiation therapy was associated with increased CRS risk, particularly among patients with NPC; qualitative findings also implicated advanced disease stage and concurrent chemotherapy.

Key findings

  • Pooled CRS incidence across HNC patients was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.27-0.47).
  • CRS incidence was higher with NPC than other HNC: 0.45 vs. 0.18, p < 0.001.
  • Radiation therapy was associated with higher CRS risk (log OR = 1.46, 95% CI of 0.76, 2.16), with a stronger association in NPC (log OR of 1.82 vs. log OR of 0.52, p = 0.01).
  • The maxillary sinuses were most commonly involved (incidence 0.60), followed by the ethmoid sinuses (0.45).

Why it matters

CRS is a relevant post-treatment outcome in HNC, and the pooled findings suggest that risk differs by cancer site and treatment exposure. Awareness of these associations can inform clinical attention to sinonasal symptoms during and after cancer care, while the substantial variation in diagnostic methods cautions against treating the pooled incidence as a uniform estimate.

What to keep in mind

The included studies differed substantially in how CRS was diagnosed, and the pooled evidence combines studies with differing designs and populations.

Source

Published in Laryngoscope. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Otolaryngology (ENT)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.