Respiratory Stabilization for Successful Intubation in Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Indian PediatrApr 8, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchPediatricsEmergency MedicineOpen access

Deeksha Gupta, Poonam Singh, Mayank Priyadarshi et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized controlled trial assessed whether continuing pre-existing non-invasive respiratory support during endotracheal intubation (ETI) improved procedural stability in neonates of at least 26 weeks’ gestation requiring NICU intubation. Among 150 randomized neonates, first-attempt intubation without physiological instability occurred in 73.3% with respiratory support and 62.7% in room air; the difference was not statistically significant (relative risk 1.3 [0.7-1.7]; P = 0.161). Minimum oxygen saturation was lower and its decline greater in controls, while rates of desaturation, bradycardia and change in cerebral oxygen saturation did not differ.

Key findings

  • First-attempt intubation without physiological instability occurred in 73.3% with support versus 62.7% in room air (relative risk 1.3 [0.7-1.7]; P = 0.161).
  • Minimum SpO₂ was significantly lower, and its change from baseline significantly greater, in controls.
  • Rates of desaturation, bradycardia and change in regional cerebral oxygen saturation did not differ between groups.

Why it matters

Intubation can be accompanied by oxygenation changes in neonates. This trial suggests that maintaining existing non-invasive support may help preserve oxygen saturation during the procedure, but it did not demonstrate a significant improvement in the primary outcome of first-attempt success without physiological instability. The distinction is relevant when interpreting a physiological benefit that did not translate into a statistically significant primary-outcome result.

What to keep in mind

Neonates with baseline bradycardia, life-threatening congenital anomalies or emergency intubation were excluded, limiting applicability to these groups.

Source

Published in Indian Pediatr. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pediatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.