From neck to abdomen: cervical (C3) muscle quantification as a surrogate to lumbar (L3) sarcopenia assessment in head and neck cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Skeletal RadiolApr 10, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOncology (Medical)Open access

Mehrad Zare, Alisa Mohebbi, Mohammad Hossein Eslami et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed whether CT-derived skeletal muscle index at the third cervical vertebra (C3) can serve as a surrogate for the third lumbar vertebra (L3) in adults with head and neck cancer. Across 14 studies involving 2017 patients, the pooled correlation between C3 and L3 measurements was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.84; I 2 = 90.3%). Correlations were stronger in sex-specific analyses, and agreement increased with BMI. The authors conclude that routine cervical imaging may support sarcopenia assessment, while noting that prospective validation is needed.

Key findings

  • Across 14 studies and 2017 patients, the pooled C3–L3 muscle-index correlation was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.84; I 2 = 90.3%).
  • Sex-specific correlations were 0.92 in men and 0.94 in women.
  • Correlation increased from 0.70 at BMI 23 to 0.90 at BMI 27.

Why it matters

L3-based sarcopenia assessment may be unavailable when abdominal CT is not routinely obtained in head and neck cancer. The observed correlation suggests that existing cervical imaging could offer a more accessible way to estimate muscle status, potentially avoiding additional imaging exposure. However, substantial heterogeneity and the need to validate thresholds mean that correlation alone does not establish equivalent clinical classification or outcome prediction.

What to keep in mind

The pooled correlation showed substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 90.3%). The authors call for prospective multicenter studies to standardize protocols and validate clinical utility.

Source

Published in Skeletal Radiol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.