Effect of a dynamic wrist-hand orthosis combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy on upper limb and hand function in acute and sub-acute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Top Stroke RehabilApr 14, 2026 (epub)

Songhua Huang, Tianhao Gao, Junqi Ling et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This assessor-blinded, two-part randomized controlled trial evaluated adding a SaeboGlove dynamic wrist-hand orthosis to modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) in people with acute or sub-acute stroke. In Part A, 18 participants receiving the combined intervention were compared with 19 receiving mCIMT alone; in Part B, 10 receiving the combination were compared with 9 controls. The combined group scored 7.23 points higher on the Wolf Motor Function Test than the mCIMT-only group (95% CI 1.93 to 12.53). The authors conclude that the orthosis may enhance mCIMT benefits and broaden eligibility.

Key findings

  • In Part A, the combined-intervention group scored 7.23 points higher on the WMFT than the mCIMT-only group (95% CI 1.93 to 12.53; P < 0.05).
  • In Part A, WMFT hand-grip strength was 3.29 points higher with mCIMT plus SaeboGlove than with mCIMT alone (95% CI 1.35 to 5.24; P < 0.01).
  • In Part B, the combined group scored 5.45 points higher on the WMFT than controls (95% CI 1.92 to 8.98; P < 0.01).
  • In Part B, the combined group had an ARAT score 10.75 points higher than controls (95% CI 0.93 to 20.57; P < 0.05).

Why it matters

Limited ability of the affected limb can prevent some people from undertaking mCIMT. These trial results suggest that an orthosis may support functional and grip-strength gains when mCIMT is used, including among people who might not otherwise qualify. This addresses a practical barrier to delivering a rehabilitation approach, while the findings remain specific to the interventions and outcomes studied.

What to keep in mind

The trial groups were small, with 9 to 19 participants each, and the abstract reports outcomes from a three-week intervention without describing longer-term follow-up.

Source

Published in Top Stroke Rehabil. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.