Intratumoral Sotigalimab with Pembrolizumab Induces Rapid Activation of Antigen-Presenting Cells and Drives Antitumor Responses in Non-injected Tumors in Metastatic Melanoma: A Phase I/II Study.

Cancer DiscovSep 1, 2026

Salah-Eddine Bentebibel, Daniel J McGrail, Veena Kochat et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This phase I/II clinical trial evaluated intratumoral sotigalimab, a CD40 agonist, plus pembrolizumab in 32 patients with immune-checkpoint-blocker-naïve metastatic melanoma. The combination was reported as well tolerated. At the recommended phase II dose, the objective response rate was 50% and the disease control rate was 92%; response rates were 67% in injected tumors and 50% in non-injected tumors. Tumor and blood analyses showed CD40-pathway engagement and immune activation, including cytotoxic responses in non-injected tumors. Clinical responses correlated with these immune changes, but not with baseline features associated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy response.

Key findings

  • At the recommended phase II dose, objective response rate was 50% and disease control rate was 92%.
  • Objective response rates were 67% in injected tumors and 50% in non-injected tumors.
  • Sotigalimab engaged the CD40 pathway and increased infiltration and activation of myeloid cells, including dendritic cells and macrophages.
  • T-cell clonality increased, with new expanded clones shared across tumors; clinical responses correlated with immune changes.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that intratumoral CD40 stimulation alongside PD-1 blockade can be associated with immune activation beyond the injected lesion, an important consideration in metastatic disease. The observed responses and immune changes provide a rationale for further evaluation of this combination, while the early-phase design means the results do not establish comparative benefit over pembrolizumab alone.

What to keep in mind

This was a phase I/II study in 32 patients, and the abstract supports further randomized phase II trials rather than establishing comparative efficacy.

Source

Published in Cancer Discov. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.