Autograft Versus Allograft in Pediatric Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
Sebastian M Perez-Espina, Christian F Zirbes, Alyssa Henriquez et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This systematic review evaluated outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using autograft versus allograft in pediatric patients. Analyzing 23 studies with 849 knees, it found significant improvements in Kujala, Lysholm scores, and VAS pain for autograft patients. Return-to-sport rates were similar (92.9% for allograft vs. 90.9% for autograft), but more allograft patients returned at equal or higher levels (90.9% vs. 71.2%, P =0.0002).
Key findings
- Kujala scores significantly improved in the autograft cohort (P <0.0001).
- Lysholm scores improved significantly for autograft patients (P =0.002).
- Return-to-sport rates were similar: 92.9% for allograft vs. 90.9% for autograft.
- More allograft patients returned to sport at equal or higher levels (90.9% vs. 71.2%, P =0.0002).
Why it matters
Understanding the comparative outcomes of autograft versus allograft in MPFL reconstruction can guide clinicians in making informed decisions regarding surgical options for pediatric patients with patellofemoral instability.
What to keep in mind
Generalizability is limited due to sparse data, particularly on allograft patients.