Reproductive outcomes after rescue luteal phase support for women with low serum progesterone in artificial cycles around frozen embryo transfer day: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of over 7500 patients.

Int J Gynaecol ObstetMay 5, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchObstetrics & Gynecology

Andrea Etrusco, Vittorio Agrifoglio, Antonio D'Amato et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and network meta-analysis examined rescue luteal phase support (LPS) for women with low serum progesterone around frozen embryo transfer in artificially prepared cycles. It included 12 observational studies with more than 7500 participants, comparing supplemental progesterone given by different routes. Rescue LPS was associated with reproductive outcomes approaching those in women with adequate progesterone levels. Intramuscular and vaginal administration often ranked highest, but no protocol showed clear superiority. The authors note substantial between-study heterogeneity, especially in progesterone thresholds, and call for randomized trials using standardized protocols.

Key findings

  • The review included 12 observational studies comprising more than 7500 participants.
  • Rescue LPS was associated with reproductive outcomes approaching those observed in women with adequate progesterone levels.
  • Intramuscular and vaginal progesterone often ranked highest, but no administration protocol demonstrated clear superiority.
  • Studies varied substantially, particularly in the progesterone cutoff values used to define low levels.

Why it matters

Low progesterone around transfer has been associated with reduced reproductive success, and this synthesis suggests that supplemental progesterone may help address that concern. However, the evidence does not establish which route is best, and variation in thresholds and protocols limits comparisons. The findings highlight the need for better-standardized evidence before the relative benefits of rescue approaches can be determined.

What to keep in mind

The evidence came from observational studies, with substantial heterogeneity, particularly in progesterone cutoff values; randomized trials are needed to confirm the findings.

Source

Published in Int J Gynaecol Obstet. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.