Contraceptive Counseling Quality and Postpartum Contraceptive Method Satisfaction: A Multi-Institutional Cross-Sectional Analysis.

J Womens Health (Larchmt)May 8, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchObstetrics & Gynecology

Nicole Luche, Elizabeth A Mosley, Nikki Zite et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This multicentre cross-sectional analysis examined whether perceived contraceptive counseling quality was associated with method satisfaction three months postpartum. It used data from 219 pregnant individuals aged 21–44 years who were considering tubal sterilization and had enrolled in a randomized trial of a decision aid. Overall, 61% reported optimal counseling and 65% optimal method satisfaction. After adjustment, optimal counseling was associated with higher odds of optimal satisfaction (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.03-3.46, p = 0.04); the association was sustained across the individual counseling domains.

Key findings

  • Optimal counseling was associated with higher odds of optimal postpartum method satisfaction (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.03-3.46, p = 0.04).
  • Optimal counseling and optimal method satisfaction were reported by 61% and 65% of participants, respectively.
  • Respect, discussion of method pros and cons, avoiding pressure, and answering questions were each associated with satisfaction.

Why it matters

Postpartum contraceptive decisions can involve multiple methods and patient preferences. These findings link patients’ perceptions of respectful, informative, non-pressuring counseling with satisfaction with their chosen method. They underscore the relevance of counseling quality as an outcome alongside method selection, while the observational analysis does not establish that counseling practices caused greater satisfaction.

What to keep in mind

The cross-sectional analysis assessed counseling perceptions and method satisfaction at three months postpartum, so it cannot establish causality. Participants were pregnant individuals considering tubal sterilization who enrolled in a decision-aid trial, which may limit generalizability.

Source

Published in J Womens Health (Larchmt). This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.