Effect of Dual-Task Training on Motor, Cognitive, and Dual-Task Performance in School-Age Children: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Pediatr Exerc SciMay 14, 2026 (epub)

Sema Büğüşan Oruç, Eda Gülbetekin

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized controlled trial assessed whether dual-task (DT) training improved motor, cognitive, and combined-task performance in 108 children aged 8–10 years in eastern Türkiye. Children in the intervention group completed DT training during physical education once weekly for 40 minutes over 4 weeks; controls continued regular classes. The intervention group improved from baseline in single-task cognitive and motor performance. Adjusted posttest scores also differed between groups under DT conditions (F = 9.010, P = .003, η2 = .079), supporting an effect of training on performance while completing concurrent cognitive and motor tasks.

Key findings

  • The intervention group improved in single-task cognitive performance between first and last measurements (t = -4.035; P = .000).
  • Single-task motor performance improved in the intervention group (t = -3.182; P = .002).
  • Adjusted posttest scores differed between groups under DT conditions (F = 9.010, P = .003, η2 = .079).
  • Groups did not differ in the difficulty levels of cognitive and motor tasks (P > .05).

Why it matters

Children often need to coordinate movement with cognitive demands. This trial suggests that a brief, structured DT programme within physical education can improve performance on measures involving motor and cognitive tasks, including their combination. The findings add evidence that training these demands together may be relevant to children’s functional performance, while the reported outcomes do not establish effects beyond the tested measures.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not report follow-up beyond the 4-week training period, so persistence of the observed improvements is unclear.

Source

Published in Pediatr Exerc Sci. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pediatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.