Comparative effectiveness of defocus lenses, atropine, and their combined use for myopia control in children: A systematic review.

Eur J OphthalmolMay 19, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOphthalmologyPediatrics

Abdulaziz Hassan, Abdullah Hasan, Hasan Ibrahim et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review compared defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) lenses, atropine, and their combination for myopia control in children. It included 1,460 participants across eight comparative studies, with outcomes assessed after at least 6 months. DIMS and atropine monotherapy generally showed similar effects on spherical equivalent refraction (SER), although findings for axial length (AL) varied. Combination therapy more often reduced SER and AL than either treatment alone; all studies comparing combination therapy with DIMS favored the combination for AL, with three reporting statistically significant differences. The review also judged DIMS to have fewer adverse effects.

Key findings

  • Across three studies comparing monotherapies, SER reduction did not differ significantly except in one study favoring atropine.
  • Two studies found significantly less axial elongation with DIMS than atropine; one found no significant difference.
  • Three of four studies reported significantly greater SER reduction with combination therapy than with DIMS alone.
  • All studies comparing combination therapy with DIMS favored the combination for axial length, with three reporting statistically significant results.

Why it matters

The review suggests that both DIMS lenses and atropine can be used to manage childhood myopia, while combining them may provide greater control of refractive change and axial elongation. Its comparison of efficacy and adverse effects can inform discussions of treatment options, although the findings come from a limited set of comparative studies and do not establish that one approach is best for every child.

What to keep in mind

The review included only eight studies, and results varied across comparisons; the abstract does not report pooled effect estimates.

Source

Published in Eur J Ophthalmol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Ophthalmology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.