A nonopioid multimodal pain protocol achieves equivalent pain control after total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

J Shoulder Elbow SurgMay 19, 2026 (epub)

Hardy Evans, Joshua P Castle, Johnny Kasto et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial compared postoperative nonopioid multimodal analgesia with an opioid-containing regimen after primary anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Among 78 patients, pain scores at 10 days were comparable between groups, while opioid consumption was lower with the nonopioid protocol: 0.4 ± 1.35 versus 3.7 ± 5.07 morphine milligram equivalents (P < .001). Side effects did not differ significantly. The findings indicate that, in this selected surgical population, the nonopioid regimen achieved pain relief comparable to the opioid-based regimen while reducing opioid use.

Key findings

  • At 10 days, mean visual analog scale pain scores were 2.4 ± 1.7 with multimodal analgesia and 2.3 ± 1.6 with the opioid regimen (P = .52).
  • Median Pain Interference scores were 61.5 (interquartile range 58.5-67.0) and 62.0 (interquartile range 56.5-64.0), respectively (P = .90).
  • Opioid consumption was 0.4 ± 1.35 morphine milligram equivalents in the multimodal group versus 3.7 ± 5.07 in the opioid group (P < .001).
  • Side effects did not differ significantly between treatment groups.

Why it matters

Postoperative pain management must balance adequate relief with limiting opioid exposure. This trial suggests that a multimodal nonopioid protocol can provide comparable short-term pain outcomes after primary shoulder arthroplasty while reducing opioid consumption. The results add randomized evidence relevant to opioid-sparing approaches, although they apply to the study’s selected patients and measured postoperative period.

What to keep in mind

Follow-up and reported outcomes covered only the first 10 postoperative days; patients with recent opioid use, revision surgery, or fracture surgery were excluded.

Source

Published in J Shoulder Elbow Surg. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Orthopedic Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.