Whole-brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost in treatment of patients with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clin Transl OncolMay 22, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOncology (Medical)Radiology (Diagnostic)Open access

Dominik Wróbel, Aleksandra Sobieryn, Adam Kozik et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared whole-brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (WBRT-SIB) against WBRT alone for patients with brain metastases. Across 30 studies involving 2,033 patients, WBRT-SIB was associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.7, 95%CI 0.5-0.96, p = 0.03), intracranial progression-free survival, and intracranial local progression-free survival. The survival benefit was mainly observed in patients with small-cell lung cancer; no significant effect was found for other tumour types. The analysis found no increased risk of treatment-related adverse events.

Key findings

  • Compared with WBRT alone, WBRT-SIB improved overall survival (HR = 0.7, 95%CI 0.5-0.96, p = 0.03).
  • WBRT-SIB improved intracranial progression-free survival (HR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.47-0.96, p = 0.03) and intracranial local progression-free survival (HR = 0.55, 95%CI 0.4-0.79, p < 0.01).
  • The survival benefit was mainly driven by patients with small-cell lung cancer (HR = 0.54, 95%CI 0.31-0.92, p = 0.025); no significant effect was observed for other tumour types.
  • WBRT-SIB did not increase treatment-related adverse events; radiation necrosis incidence was 5.05% (95%CI 1.19%-10.77%).

Why it matters

For patients with multiple brain metastases who are not candidates for focal treatment, intracranial control and survival are important outcomes. This pooled evidence suggests WBRT-SIB may improve these outcomes without an observed increase in treatment-related adverse events, although the apparent survival benefit is concentrated in small-cell lung cancer. The findings help frame which patients may warrant further evaluation of this approach.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not describe the designs or quality of the included studies, limiting assessment of how confidently pooled associations can be interpreted.

Source

Published in Clin Transl Oncol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.