Effects of Oro-Esophageal Versus Nasogastric Feeding on Mental Health in Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Arch Phys Med RehabilMay 22, 2026 (epub)
Hongji Zeng, Shiyu Zhang, Teng Zuo et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This randomized controlled trial investigated the impact of oro-esophageal versus nasogastric feeding on mental health in 156 ischemic stroke survivors with dysphagia. Results indicated that oro-esophageal feeding significantly improved anxiety and depression symptoms, with a notable interaction effect (η 2 =0.670 for anxiety, η 2 =0.483 for depression) compared to nasogastric feeding over a 60-day follow-up period.
Key findings
- 94.29% of participants in the oro-esophageal group completed follow-up compared to 91.04% in the nasogastric group.
- Significant interaction effects were observed in anxiety symptoms (η 2 =0.670) and depression symptoms (η 2 =0.483).
- Oro-esophageal feeding improved self-efficacy (η 2 =0.715) and reduced subjective social isolation (η 2 =0.773).
- Perceived nausea showed significant time effects (P<.001) at follow-up.
Why it matters
Understanding the effects of different feeding methods on mental health can guide clinicians in optimizing care for stroke survivors with dysphagia, potentially improving their overall recovery and quality of life.