Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nerve decompression for neuropathic sciatic pain due to endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Gynaecol ObstetMay 27, 2026 (epub)

Camille Racca, Julia Franken, Marion Cahen et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed laparoscopic decompression for neuropathic sciatic pain associated with endometriosis. Eight interventional and observational studies included 744 individuals; five studies contributed extractable pain data for 520. The pooled mean reduction in sciatic pain was 6.47 points (95% confidence interval 5.55-7.43) on validated 10-point scales. Major complications occurred in 8% of cases, mainly in association with concomitant pelvic procedures. The authors concluded that decompression appears associated with substantial pain reduction, while emphasizing caution because the evidence is predominantly observational.

Key findings

  • Across five studies (n = 520), pooled mean sciatic pain reduction was 6.47 points (95% confidence interval 5.55-7.43) on validated 10-point scales.
  • Sciatic nerve involvement was found in 52.3% of cases (n = 389), and sacral nerve root involvement in 45.0% (n = 335).
  • Major complications occurred in 8% of cases and were mainly associated with concomitant pelvic procedures.
  • Complete resolution of lower-limb neuropathic symptoms was reported in a subset of individuals.

Why it matters

Endometriosis involving the sciatic nerve or sacral plexus can present with neuropathic pain, yet the abstract notes that specific management guidelines are lacking. The pooled findings suggest that laparoscopic decompression may be associated with meaningful pain improvement, while the reported complications and observational evidence underscore the need to weigh potential benefit against uncertainty.

What to keep in mind

Evidence was predominantly observational and had low to moderate risk of bias, limiting certainty about the effects of decompression.

Source

Published in Int J Gynaecol Obstet. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.