Platelet-Rich Products Can Have Variable Effects on Outcomes After Arthroscopic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Repair: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

ArthroscopyMay 27, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOrthopedic Surgery

WeiYi Chen, WanQing Qi, YunQing Su et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials assessed platelet-rich products as augmentation during arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Overall, platelet-rich products significantly reduced retear rates and improved Constant, visual analog scale, and University of California, Los Angeles scores compared with controls (P < .05), but did not significantly affect American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Subgroup analyses found outcome differences by product characteristics and application method. The authors judged the clinical significance of the overall improvements to be limited.

Key findings

  • Across 15 trials, platelet-rich products significantly reduced retear rates and improved Constant, visual analog scale, and University of California, Los Angeles scores (P < .05).
  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores did not differ significantly with platelet-rich product augmentation.
  • Lower retear rates were reported in subgroups using products with poor leukocytes (P < .0001), higher platelet concentrations (P = .0005), liquid form (P = .0005), or platelet-rich plasma type (P < .0001).

Why it matters

The findings suggest that platelet-rich augmentation may affect structural and some functional outcomes after rotator cuff repair, while effects vary across measured scores and product subgroups. The authors note that the overall improvements may not be clinically meaningful, so statistical differences should not be assumed to translate into important patient benefit.

What to keep in mind

The meta-analysis combined trials using different platelet-rich products and application approaches; subgroup findings may therefore not establish which formulation or method is most effective.

Source

Published in Arthroscopy. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Orthopedic Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.