Selective deep lobe parotidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Br J Oral Maxillofac SurgMar 27, 2026 (epub)

I Burridge, M Marwat, V Manoharan et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This PRISMA-based systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis assessed outcomes after selective deep lobe parotidectomy, which preserves the superficial lobe, for deep lobe parotid tumours. Eight studies comprising 299 patients were included; all tumours were benign, and no malignancies were reported. Temporary facial weakness occurred in 24.2%, while permanent weakness occurred in 3.0%; recurrence was 0.8%. The authors concluded that the procedure is a safe option for benign deep lobe tumours, while noting the need for larger prospective comparative studies with long-term follow-up.

Key findings

  • Across 299 patients, temporary facial weakness occurred in 24.2% and permanent weakness in 3.0%.
  • Recurrence was 0.8%; reported complications also included auricular numbness in 36.7% and contour deformity in 11.8%.
  • All tumours in the included studies were benign; pleomorphic adenoma accounted for 225 cases (75.3%).

Why it matters

Deep lobe parotid surgery is challenging because of the tumour location and proximity to the facial nerve. These pooled outcomes provide a summary of reported morbidity and recurrence for an approach that preserves the superficial lobe. The findings may help frame discussions of surgical options for benign deep lobe tumours, while the evidence base remains limited to the included studies.

What to keep in mind

The review included eight studies and 299 patients, all with benign tumours. The authors call for larger prospective comparative studies with long-term follow-up.

Source

Published in Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Otolaryngology (ENT)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.