Mupirocin Nasal Irrigation Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Am J Rhinol AllergyJun 7, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOtolaryngology (ENT)

Mohammad H Al-Bar, Abdulsalam Alqutub, Jose W Ruiz et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial evaluated postoperative mupirocin irrigation in adults with chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. Participants received mupirocin 0.05% or saline irrigation twice daily for 21 days; 56 of 68 enrolled patients completed follow-up. Both groups improved in SNOT-22 and visual analog scale scores, with no significant between-group differences. At 1 month, mupirocin was associated with less endoscopic mucosal edema and polyp formation, more negative postoperative cultures, and reduced need for systemic oral antibiotics. The study found no additional patient-reported quality-of-life benefit.

Key findings

  • SNOT-22 and visual analog scale scores improved in both groups, without significant between-group differences.
  • At 1 month, the mupirocin group had significantly lower rates of endoscopic mucosal edema and polyp formation.
  • Negative postoperative cultures were more frequent and systemic oral antibiotic use was lower with mupirocin.
  • No significant group differences were observed in crusting, granulation tissue, purulence, steroid use, or pain medication requirements.

Why it matters

The trial distinguishes patient-reported recovery from early endoscopic and microbiological outcomes: mupirocin did not improve reported quality of life beyond saline, but findings suggest possible benefits for early inflammation and bacterial culture results. These outcomes may inform evaluation of postoperative irrigation strategies, while the need for larger studies limits confidence in the apparent benefits.

What to keep in mind

Only 56 of 68 enrolled patients completed follow-up, and outcomes were assessed within the first 3 months. The authors call for larger studies with longer follow-up.

Source

Published in Am J Rhinol Allergy. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Otolaryngology (ENT)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.