Effectiveness of passive vs. assistive robotic gait training on functional recovery and neuroplasticity post-stroke: A randomized controlled trial.
Gait PostureJun 5, 2026 (epub)
Yun-Juan Xie, Mei-Si Song, Xiao-Dan Ma et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of assistive and passive robotic gait training on motor function recovery in 48 stroke patients. Significant improvements were observed in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity scores across all groups, with the passive group showing the highest mean difference of 3.67. No significant differences between training modalities were found.
Key findings
- Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores improved significantly in all groups, with the passive group showing a mean difference of 3.67.
- Berg Balance Scale scores improved across all groups, but no significant inter-group differences were noted.
- Modified Barthel Index scores demonstrated a significant time effect, with no notable group differences.
Why it matters
Understanding the effectiveness of different robotic gait training modalities can guide rehabilitation strategies for stroke patients, potentially enhancing recovery outcomes. The study highlights the importance of neuroplasticity in functional recovery.