Is Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation Associated With Outcomes Following Primary THA and TKA? A Systematic Review Utilizing the Area Deprivation Index.

Clin Orthop Relat ResJun 11, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOrthopedic Surgery

Angelina R Furyes, Khaled A Elmenawi, Loren Hackett et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review examined whether neighborhood deprivation measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was associated with outcomes after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. Sixteen studies were included; findings were synthesized qualitatively because of study heterogeneity. Higher ADI was consistently associated with greater healthcare utilization, including longer hospital stays, nonhome discharge, and emergency department visits, as well as more medical complications. Patients in more deprived neighborhoods had worse absolute postoperative patient-reported scores, although improvement was comparable and all groups achieved the minimum clinically important difference. Evidence on implant survivorship was limited but suggested poorer outcomes with greater deprivation.

Key findings

  • Higher ADI was consistently associated with prolonged length of stay, greater likelihood of nonhome discharge, and increased odds of emergency department visits.
  • More deprived patients had worse absolute postoperative PROMs and were less likely to reach acceptable symptom states, despite comparable improvement.
  • ADI was not associated with failure to achieve the minimum clinically important difference; all groups achieved it across the reported outcome domains.
  • Higher ADI was associated with increased odds of medical complications; limited evidence suggested more reoperations and periprosthetic joint infection within 90 days and more aseptic revision beyond 90 days.

Why it matters

The review highlights that neighborhood-level deprivation is associated with postoperative resource needs and complications after hip and knee replacement, while differences in absolute patient-reported status do not necessarily reflect less improvement. Considering social and structural context may help interpret outcome variation and identify where additional support could be relevant, although the review does not establish that deprivation itself causes these outcomes.

What to keep in mind

The included studies were heterogeneous, so results were synthesized qualitatively and no meta-analysis was performed. Evidence on implant survivorship was limited.

Source

Published in Clin Orthop Relat Res. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Orthopedic Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.