The follicular microbiome in hair-follicle-associated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review.

Clin Exp DermatolOct 27, 2026
Clinical ResearchDermatology

Agathe Franz, Andria Constantinou, Doris Wilborn et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review qualitatively synthesized culture-independent studies of the bacterial hair-follicle microbiome in inflammatory hair-follicle-associated diseases. It included 55 studies involving 1811 patients from 19 countries. Despite substantial variation in sampling and laboratory methods, Cutibacterium and Staphylococcus were the genera most often reported as altered. Staphylococcus abundance was generally increased across diseases, while Cutibacterium findings varied by condition. Results were inconclusive for alopecia areata and rosacea. The review identifies recurring microbial patterns but concludes that their causal significance remains unclear.

Key findings

  • The review included 55 studies involving 1811 patients from 19 countries.
  • Staphylococcus showed increased relative abundance across diseases, particularly in scarring alopecias, seborrhoeic dermatitis/dandruff, and acne.
  • Reduced Cutibacterium abundance was reported in seborrhoeic dermatitis/dandruff, while Cutibacterium acnes appeared more prevalent in androgenetic alopecia.
  • Findings were inconclusive for alopecia areata and rosacea; hidradenitis suppurativa findings suggested enrichment of anaerobic opportunists, including Porphyromonas and Prevotella.

Why it matters

The review brings together evidence that follicular microbial communities may differ across several inflammatory skin and hair disorders. These recurring patterns can help frame research into disease biology, but substantial methodological variation and uncertain causality mean they should not be interpreted as established mechanisms or treatment targets.

What to keep in mind

The included studies varied substantially in sampling, storage, DNA extraction, sequencing, and analysis, limiting confidence in comparisons across diseases.

Source

Published in Clin Exp Dermatol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Dermatology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.