Comparison of deep and nondeep hypothermia in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Milton Sérgio Bohatch Júnior, Leo Consoli, Elisabeth Amanda Gomes Soares et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) versus non-DHCA techniques in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair among 1041 patients. The study found that DHCA significantly reduced the risk of spinal cord injury (RR, 0.44; P = .012) but was associated with longer postoperative ventilation times (RR, 1.34; P = .003).
Key findings
- DHCA was associated with a significantly lower risk of spinal cord injury (RR, 0.44; P = .012).
- DHCA resulted in prolonged postoperative ventilation time (RR, 1.34; P = .003).
- No significant differences were found in overall mortality or stroke rates between DHCA and non-DHCA groups.
- Older patient cohorts showed longer recovery periods post-surgery.
Why it matters
Understanding the comparative risks and benefits of DHCA versus non-DHCA techniques is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgeries, particularly regarding neuroprotection and recovery times.