Capsule endoscopy for treat-to-target monitoring in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gastrointest EndoscJun 25, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchGastroenterology

Clelia Marmo, Francesca Sofia Puca, Deirdre McNamara et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed capsule endoscopy for monitoring mucosal activity and guiding treatment in patients with small-bowel or ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Nine randomized or observational studies included 321 patients. Active disease was found in 76.3% at baseline, prompting treatment modification in 71% overall and 93% of those with active disease. After a weighted mean follow-up of 33.5 weeks, the pooled proportion achieving mucosal healing was 27% (95% CI, 18%-38%); results showed substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 71%).

Key findings

  • Baseline active disease was detected in 76.3% of patients; treatment was modified in 71% overall and 93% of those with active disease.
  • Mucosal healing followed targeted therapy in a pooled 27% of patients (95% CI, 18%-38%) after a weighted mean follow-up of 33.5 weeks.
  • Mucosal response occurred in 43% of patients, while 34% showed no response.
  • Capsule retention was reported in 1 case.

Why it matters

Capsule endoscopy can assess mucosal activity across the gastrointestinal tract and may identify disease that prompts treatment optimization in treat-to-target care. The pooled healing estimate indicates that healing was achieved in a minority of patients in the included studies, while substantial heterogeneity limits how consistently these results can be applied. Long-term clinical outcomes remain to be clarified.

What to keep in mind

The nine included studies comprised only 321 patients and had substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 71%). The review also notes that outcome definitions require standardization and that effects on long-term clinical outcomes remain unclear.

Source

Published in Gastrointest Endosc. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Gastroenterology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.