Comparison of [ 18 F]DCFPyL and [ 18 F]FAPI-74 PET/CT imaging in metastatic prostate cancer.
Anniina Hyväkkä, Marko Seppänen, Maria Sundvall et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This prospective clinical trial compared the efficacy of PSMA-targeted [18F]DCFPyL and FAPI-targeted [18F]FAPI-74 PET/CT imaging in 39 patients with metastatic prostate cancer. The study found that [18F]DCFPyL detected 99% of lesions, while [18F]FAPI-74 identified only 58%. The median SUVmax was significantly higher for PSMA at 24 compared to FAPI at 5.4 (p < 0.001).
Key findings
- [18F]DCFPyL detected 1351 lesions (99%) compared to [18F]FAPI-74's 788 lesions (58%).
- Median SUVmax was 24 for PSMA and 5.4 for FAPI (p < 0.001).
- Median tracer-positive tumor volume was 85 mL for [18F]DCFPyL and 10 mL for [18F]FAPI-74 (p < 0.001).
- Only 14 lesions (1%) were FAPI-positive and PSMA-negative.
Why it matters
The study highlights the superior performance of PSMA PET/CT over FAPI PET/CT in detecting metastatic lesions in prostate cancer, which is crucial for guiding treatment decisions and optimizing patient management.