PRAME Immunostaining in Acral Melanocytic Proliferations: A Meta-Analysis.

Am J DermatopatholMay 12, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchDermatology

Ana L Toussaint, Carlos Sánchez-Cárdenas, Ruth Fuentes-García et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic utility of PRAME immunohistochemistry in acral melanocytic proliferations, analyzing 930 lesions from 13 studies. The findings indicated that PRAME expression in acral melanoma achieved a diagnostic accuracy with a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 92% at a cutoff of 3+/50%.

Key findings

  • PRAME expression in acral melanoma demonstrated a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 92%.
  • The analysis included 930 lesions, comprising 557 malignant and 373 benign cases.
  • The study utilized a random-effects model to assess diagnostic accuracy.

Why it matters

Understanding the diagnostic accuracy of PRAME immunostaining can aid clinicians in distinguishing between malignant and benign acral melanocytic lesions, which is crucial given the aggressive nature of acral melanoma.

Source

Published in Am J Dermatopathol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Dermatology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.